Unveiling the Truth: How CMI Misrepresents Ancient Chinese Language

CMI Misrepresents Ancient Chinese Language

The claims made by CMI regarding the relationship between ancient Chinese characters and the biblical narrative are based on extensive research. While some critics argue that there are errors in the etymologies and interpretations of these characters, a closer examination reveals that these claims are flawed.

1. Chinese Characters as Hieroglyphics: The study of Chinese characters reveals a consistent pattern in hundreds of characters, especially in the earliest forms of Chinese writing found on oracle bones and ancient bronzeware. These studies indicate that Chinese writing originated as hieroglyphics with religious significance.

2. Chinese Characters and Genesis: The connection between Chinese characters and Genesis is not merely imaginative speculation. Several publications, such as "God's Promise to the Chinese" and "God and the Ancient Chinese," explore the links between Chinese characters and biblical narratives. These works involve experts who are fluent in both spoken and written Chinese, including individuals from Singapore, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.

3. Interpretation of Chinese Characters: Critics often point out supposed errors in the interpretation of Chinese characters. For example, they argue that the character for "ship" does not represent the number "eight." However, scholars have shown that the radical used in the character for "eight" is a stylized form of the number, which is commonly understood by native speakers. Ancient forms of the character also confirm this interpretation.

4. ShangDi and Missionaries: Some critics claim that the translation of "Shang Di" for God was influenced by missionaries in China. However, historical evidence contradicts this assertion. The term "Shang Di," meaning "supreme sovereign," predates any missionary activity in China. It is mentioned in ancient texts like the Shu Jing (Book of History) and is associated with sacrifices performed by emperors.

1. Flawed Etymologies: Critics argue that all the etymologies they have seen are deeply flawed. However, their analysis lacks a comprehensive understanding of the research on ancient Chinese characters. More recent studies have examined the most ancient forms of Chinese writing, providing stronger evidence for the connections with Genesis.

2. The Importance of Truth: As Christians, it is crucial to pursue truth. Jesus Himself affirmed the literal history of Genesis, including the creation of Adam and Eve and the global Flood. Therefore, the efforts to explore the connections between Chinese characters and Genesis should be respected, as they contribute to a serious inquiry into truth.

Why This Matters: The study of ancient Chinese characters and their relationship to Genesis is significant for believers seeking to understand the historical accuracy of the Bible. It provides additional evidence that supports the biblical account and challenges the prevailing secular narrative.

Think About It: When evaluating claims made by critics, it is essential to consider their level of expertise in the subject matter. The extensive research conducted by scholars fluent in Chinese and familiar with its cultural context provides a strong foundation for exploring the connections between Chinese characters and biblical narratives. As Christians, we should approach these discussions with open minds, seeking truth while acknowledging that our beliefs are based on faith in Jesus Christ as our Savior.