Unveiling Christian Perspectives on Intelligent Design: A Deep Dive

CMI's Views on the Intelligent Design Movement

Introduction

The argument of 'intelligent design' (ID) has a long history, dating back to the ancient Greeks and Romans. It was further developed by William Paley in his book Natural Theology. In recent times, scholars such as Michael Denton and Phillip Johnson have formed the Intelligent Design Movement (IDM). This article aims to provide CMI's perspective on the IDM.

The Modern Intelligent Design Movement (IDM)

The IDM seeks to challenge the materialistic, godless, naturalistic philosophy of Darwinian evolution. It questions the philosophical underpinnings of evolutionary thinking but does not align itself with biblical creationism. The IDM is led by Phillip Johnson, a retired Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley.

The IDM's General Approach

The IDM focuses on attacking "chance" evolution, which is based on naturalistic philosophy. They are open to alliances with anyone opposed to naturalism, even those who believe in evolution from microbe to man with intelligent interference at some point. They generally accept the millions and billions of years proposed by evolutionists and do not take a public stance on the implications of long-age belief.

While the IDM includes some believers in Genesis, they avoid expressing support for biblical authority in matters such as recent creation in six days or Noah's global flood. Their approach is designed to be perceived as separate from biblical influence.

The IDM's Perceived and Potential Strengths

Many biblical creationists see the IDM as a potentially effective strategy to challenge evolution. They view it as a "thin edge of the wedge" approach that can open up discussions and gain a hearing in secular circles. The IDM's broader range of supporters, including non-Christians, lends credibility and helps avoid appearing biased or parochial.

The IDM has produced materials and arguments that have been useful in supporting biblical creation. It has also drawn some of the fire away from biblical creationists, allowing them to focus on spreading their message.

CMI's Perception of the Positives of the IDM

CMI acknowledges that the IDM has helped raise awareness about the philosophical foundations of Darwinism. By highlighting the religious nature of evolutionary thinking, the IDM challenges the notion that it is a neutral scientific theory. This aligns with CMI's view that all scientific reasoning is ultimately based on axioms or presuppositions.

CMI's Perception of the IDM's Weaknesses

CMI believes that the IDM has a recurring blind spot when it comes to philosophy. While they correctly point out the religious foundations of Darwinism, they fail to recognize that all scientific reasoning is based on subjective axioms. Without a coherent philosophical framework, the IDM cannot provide a comprehensive interpretation of evidence related to the past.

The IDM's refusal to identify themselves with a specific story of the past, such as Genesis, reinforces the perception that they are creationists in disguise. This has led to attacks on the IDM similar to those faced by biblical creationists. Additionally, by not aligning themselves with biblical history, they open the door to alternative interpretations and potential rejection of biblical authority.

What About Public Education?

CMI supports the IDM's efforts to promote academic freedom and question evolution in schools. They believe that teachers should be able to critically examine arguments for and against evolution without being prevented from doing so. However, CMI does not support compulsory teaching of biblical creation, as forcing teachers to teach something they don't believe in is not desirable.

CMI argues against artificially separating "biblical" from "scientific" creation in order to gain acceptance in the public arena. They believe that discussing origins should involve openly addressing axioms or starting beliefs. Evidence can be examined through a critical comparison of models based on different axioms, without hiding or avoiding religious implications.

Summary and Conclusion

CMI appreciates the efforts of the IDM to promote academic freedom and challenge evolution. While they have concerns about certain aspects of the IDM's strategy, they do not oppose or seek to undermine its efforts. CMI emphasizes the importance of upholding the truth and authority of the Bible throughout discussions on origins.

CMI encourages careful thinking about the most effective ways to promote biblical creation while giving honor and glory to God. They believe that reforming the church and calling Christians back to biblical foundations is crucial for positively influencing society. Ultimately, CMI hopes that the IDM can make significant inroads while remaining true to biblical principles.