Divine Revelation: Unveiling the Dating Dilemma of Fossil Wood in Ancient Sandstone

Dating Dilemma: Fossil Wood in 'Ancient' Sandstone

Sydney, Australia's oldest city, is not only known for its beautiful harbor and famous landmarks but also for its unique rock formations, particularly the Hawkesbury Sandstone. This sandstone, named after the Hawkesbury River, dominates the landscape around Sydney and has a long history of speculation about its origins. Geologists have assigned it a Middle Triassic 'age' of around 225-230 million years based on its fossil content and relative position in the rock layers.

However, an interesting discovery challenges this dating. In June 1997, a piece of fossil wood was found in a slab of Hawkesbury Sandstone. Radiocarbon (14C) analysis of this fossil wood yielded a supposed age of 33,720 ± 430 years BP (before present), which conflicts with the assumed evolutionary age of the sandstone. This article will explore this dating dilemma from a conservative Christian perspective.

Key Questions

1. How does the Hawkesbury Sandstone provide clues about its formation?

The Hawkesbury Sandstone is a hard and durable rock that forms prominent cliffs and serves as an excellent building material. Its internal features, such as cross-beds and thin repetitive bands, indicate deposition in fast-flowing currents, likely caused by violent floods. Fossils within the sandstone itself are rare, but spectacular fossil graveyards have been found in mudstone lenses associated with the sandstone. These graveyards contain fish, sharks, and plant fossils indicative of sudden burial in a catastrophe.

2. What is the assigned age of the Hawkesbury Sandstone and how is it determined?

Geologists have assigned a Middle Triassic 'age' of around 225-230 million years to the Hawkesbury Sandstone based on its fossil content and relative position in the rock layers of the Sydney Basin. This dating is derived from the long ages timescale commonly assumed by geologists. However, the discovery of fossil wood within the sandstone raises questions about the accuracy of this dating.

3. How was radiocarbon (14C) analysis used to determine the age of the fossil wood?

In an attempt to determine the age of the fossil wood found in the Hawkesbury Sandstone, a sample was sent for radiocarbon analysis. The staff at Geochron Laboratories in Cambridge, Boston, used accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) to analyze the sample. The laboratory staff were not informed about the origin or supposed age of the fossil wood to avoid bias. The sample was treated with hydrochloric acid and caustic soda to remove carbonates and organic contaminants before combustion for radiocarbon analysis.

The results of the radiocarbon analysis indicated detectable radiocarbon in the fossil wood, yielding a supposed age of 33,720 ± 430 years BP. The lab staff confirmed that the detected radiocarbon likely represented organic carbon from the original wood and not contamination. This finite radiocarbon age conflicts with the assumed evolutionary age of 225-230 million years for the fossil wood.

4. How does the finite radiocarbon age challenge the evolutionary dating of the fossil wood?

The finite radiocarbon age of 33,720 ± 430 years BP obtained from the fossil wood challenges the assumed evolutionary age of 225-230 million years. According to evolutionary dating methods, all detectable radiocarbon should have decayed away within a fraction of the alleged time if the wood were truly that old. The presence of radiocarbon suggests a much younger age for the fossil wood.

5. How can a finite radiocarbon age be reconciled with a young Earth and a recent global Flood?

In a biblical framework of Earth history, the finite radiocarbon age of the fossil wood can be understood within the context of a young Earth and a recent global Flood. According to this perspective, the fossil wood was buried catastrophically in sand by the floodwaters approximately 4,500 years ago. The stronger magnetic field during that time would have shielded the Earth from incoming cosmic rays, resulting in less radiocarbon production. Additionally, the Flood buried a significant amount of carbon, leading to an artificially older radiocarbon age calculated based on assumptions about atmospheric proportions.

6. Does the presence of recent microbial or fungal activity affect the radiocarbon dating results?

Concerns about contamination by recent microbial and fungal activity were raised regarding the radiocarbon dating results of the fossil wood. However, both Geochron Laboratories and another radiocarbon laboratory confirmed that there would be no contamination problem. Modern fungi or bacteria derive their carbon from the organic material they live on and have the same 'age' as their host. The lab procedure used effectively removed any cellular tissues and waste products from fungi or bacteria.

7. What conclusions can be drawn from this dating dilemma?

The presence of detectable radiocarbon in the fossil wood challenges the assumed evolutionary age of 225-230 million years for the Hawkesbury Sandstone. While it cannot provide the true age of the wood, the radiocarbon analysis is consistent with a young Earth and a recent global Flood. The finite radiocarbon 'age' aligns with the biblical account of Earth history as recorded in Genesis.

8. How does this dating dilemma impact our understanding of Earth's history?

This dating dilemma highlights the limitations and uncertainties of dating methods used to determine the age of geological formations. It raises questions about the accuracy of long ages assigned to rocks based on assumptions and interpretations. A conservative Christian perspective, informed by the biblical account of a young Earth and a recent global Flood, provides an alternative framework for understanding Earth's history that is consistent with scientific evidence. The discovery of fossil wood within the Hawkesbury Sandstone challenges the assumed evolutionary age of this rock formation. Radiocarbon analysis yielded a finite age for the fossil wood that conflicts with the long ages commonly accepted by geologists. However, this dating dilemma can be reconciled within a biblical framework of Earth history, considering a young Earth and a recent global Flood. This case serves as a reminder that dating methods have limitations, and alternative interpretations informed by conservative Christian values should be considered. By exploring these topics from a biblical perspective, we can gain deeper insights into Earth's history and our place within it.

Keywords: radiometric, radiocarbon dating, Hawkesbury Sandstone, fossil wood, young Earth, global Flood

Source Material: "Dating dilemma: fossil wood in ‘ancient’ sandstone"