Revealing Evidence of a Transformation in Christian Faith

Is there any evidence for a change in c?

The speed of light (c) is a fundamental constant in physics and has long been considered to be a constant value. However, recent astronomical observations suggest that there may be evidence for a change in the value of c over cosmological time. This has implications for our understanding of the universe and has garnered attention from both evolutionary cosmologists and creationist cosmologists.

According to observational data presented by astrophysicist John G. Hartnett, there is evidence to suggest that the fine structure constant (α), which is related to the speed of light, may have increased over the lifetime of the universe. This increase in α implies that the impedance of free space would have decreased, leading to a decrease in the speed of light. The data from Webb et al. indicate that α has changed by about 1 part in 100,000 over the past 12 billion years.

Creationist cosmologists propose an alternative explanation for this observed change in α. They suggest that rather than a decrease in the speed of light, there was an enormous increase in c at the moment of creation, followed by a rapid decrease. This decrease in c would have resulted in an increase in α, as observed in the data. Creationist cosmologists argue that this model can explain the observed changes in α without violating General and Special Relativity.

However, it is important to note that this creationist model does not provide an explanation for some key issues in creationist cosmology. For example, it does not address the starlight-travel-time problem, which is a challenge for young-universe creationism. Additionally, the model does not provide a mechanism to explain rapid stellar aging in the early universe, which could account for the deficit of old dwarf stars in nearby galaxies.

In conclusion, while there is evidence to suggest a change in the fine structure constant and therefore a potential change in the speed of light, it is important to consider the limitations of the proposed models. The creationist model, while offering an alternative explanation for the observed changes in α, does not fully address the challenges in creationist cosmology. Further research and investigation are needed to better understand the nature of c and its potential variability.

**

What is the fine structure constant and how is it related to the speed of light?

The fine structure constant (α) is a dimensionless constant that characterizes the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between charged particles. It is a fundamental constant in physics and is related to various phenomena, including atomic spectra and the fine structure of energy levels in atoms.

The relationship between α and the speed of light (c) arises from their connection to the permittivity (ε₀) and permeability (µ₀) of free space, which describe properties of the fabric of space itself. The speed of light c can be expressed in terms of ε₀ and µ₀ as c = 1/√(ε₀µ₀). Similarly, α is related to ε₀ and µ₀ through the equation α = e²/(4πε₀ħc), where e is the charge on the electron and ħ is Planck's constant divided by 2π.

Therefore, any changes in α would imply corresponding changes in ε₀, µ₀, or both, which would affect the value of c. The observed increase in α over cosmological time suggests a decrease in the impedance of free space, leading to a decrease in c.

**

What are the implications of a change in c for creationist cosmology?

The implications of a change in the speed of light (c) for creationist cosmology are significant. Creationist cosmologists propose a model where c was enormously greater at the moment of creation and rapidly decreased thereafter. This model is consistent with the observed increase in the fine structure constant (α) over cosmological time.

However, while this model provides an alternative explanation for the observed changes in α, it does not fully address some key issues in creationist cosmology. One such issue is the starlight-travel-time problem. In a young-universe creationist cosmology, there is a challenge in explaining how light could have traveled across the vast distances of the visible universe in just 6,000 years since creation. The proposed change in c does not sufficiently resolve this problem.

Additionally, the model does not provide a mechanism to explain rapid stellar aging in the early universe. This rapid aging could account for the deficit of old dwarf stars in nearby galaxies, as proposed by Humphreys' model. Without addressing these challenges, the model cannot fully explain the observations and align with a young-universe creationist perspective.

It is important to note that no variable-speed-of-light model consistent with current observations on the fine structure constant can explain a young universe. While there may be evidence for a change in c, further research and investigation are needed to better understand its implications for creationist cosmology.

**

How do evolutionary cosmologists interpret the observed changes in α?

Evolutionary cosmologists interpret the observed changes in the fine structure constant (α) as evidence for variations in fundamental constants over cosmological time. They propose that these variations may be related to changes in the fabric of space itself, such as the unraveling of extra dimensions.

According to evolutionary cosmologists, if the universe is four-dimensional, a fifth force could be responsible for triggering these changes in fundamental constants. This fifth force would be repelling and much weaker than gravity. Some researchers suggest that this force could be related to the slowing down of light, as indicated by recent observations.

Evolutionary cosmologists are actively investigating these variations in fundamental constants and their implications for our understanding of the universe. They consider them to be important discoveries in fundamental physics that require further study and exploration.

**

How do creationist cosmologists interpret the observed changes in α?

Creationist cosmologists offer an alternative interpretation of the observed changes in the fine structure constant (α) and its potential relationship to the speed of light (c). They propose a model where c was initially enormously greater at the moment of creation and rapidly decreased thereafter.

According to this model, the decrease in c would have resulted from changes in certain parameters or "constants" related to the fabric of space itself. The process causing the decrease in c may have ceased long ago, but its effects can still be observed in astronomical data at cosmological distances.

Creationist cosmologists argue that this model can explain the observed increase in α over cosmological time without violating General and Special Relativity. However, it is important to note that this model does not provide an explanation for challenges such as the starlight-travel-time problem or rapid stellar aging in the early universe.

While creationist cosmologists propose this model as an alternative explanation for the observed changes in α, further research and investigation are needed to fully understand its implications and reconcile it with other challenges in creationist cosmology.

**

Can a change in c explain the starlight-travel-time problem in creationist cosmology?

The starlight-travel-time problem poses a challenge for young-universe creationist cosmology. It questions how light could have traveled across the vast distances of the visible universe in just 6,000 years since the moment of creation. While the proposed change in the speed of light (c) offers an alternative explanation for the observed changes in the fine structure constant (α), it does not fully resolve this problem.

In a creationist model where c was enormously greater at Creation and rapidly decreased thereafter, the decrease in c would not be sufficient to reduce the transit times of light across the universe to six thousand years. Even with a significant decrease in c near redshift z = 105, which is suggested by the model, the transit times would still far exceed the time frame proposed by young-universe creationism.

Therefore, while a change in c may have implications for our understanding of the universe, it does not provide a satisfactory solution to the starlight-travel-time problem within the framework of creationist cosmology. Further research and exploration are needed to address this challenge and reconcile it with other aspects of creationist beliefs.

**

Does a change in c explain rapid stellar aging in the early universe?

Rapid stellar aging in the early universe is another challenge in creationist cosmology. This phenomenon could account for the deficit of old dwarf stars in nearby galaxies, as proposed by Humphreys' model. However, a change in the speed of light (c) as suggested by the creationist model does not provide a mechanism to explain this rapid stellar aging.

In the creationist model, the decrease in c would have resulted in an increase in the fine structure constant (α) over cosmological time. While this change in α can explain certain observations, it does not provide an answer to the rapid aging of stars in the early universe.

The proposed model, with its focus on changes in c, does not offer a satisfactory explanation for the abundance of old dwarf stars in nearby galaxies. Further research and investigation are needed to explore alternative mechanisms that could account for rapid stellar aging and align with creationist cosmology.

**

Can a variable-speed-of-light model explain a young universe?

Variable-speed-of-light models, such as the one proposed by creationist cosmologists, have been suggested as an alternative explanation for the observed changes in the fine structure constant (α) and the potential variability of the speed of light (c). However, it is important to note that no variable-speed-of-light model consistent with current observations can explain a young universe.

While the proposed change in c offers an alternative interpretation for the observed changes in α, it does not fully address the challenges in creationist cosmology, such as the starlight-travel-time problem or rapid stellar aging. These challenges require additional explanations and mechanisms beyond a simple variation in c.

Therefore, while variable-speed-of-light models may provide insights into our understanding of fundamental constants and their potential variability, they cannot fully explain a young universe within the framework of current observations. Further research and exploration are needed to better understand the nature of c and its implications for our understanding of the cosmos.

Source: Hartnett, J. G. (2019). Implications for creationist cosmology. Journal of Creation, 33(1), 77-85.