Unlocking the Mystery of Old Earth Creation: Biblical Insights Revealed

An 'Old-Earth' Answer Provides Only Problems

In this article, Gary Bates responds to a critic who argues for an old-earth perspective. Bates begins by clarifying that when he refers to "biblical creationists," he is highlighting the belief that the Bible should be taken at face value, rather than being interpreted through the lens of secular science. He argues that an old-earth view is not consistent with a high view of Scripture and undermines the authority of the Bible.

The critic suggests that Bates is implying that those who believe in an old earth are not biblical, even if they think they are. Bates confirms this, stating that an old-earth view cannot be derived from Scripture and represents a low view of Scripture. He points out the irony in believing that God created a massive universe in Genesis 1:1 but doubting His ability to create the earth in six days.

Bates argues that deferring to science as a hermeneutical filter creates problems for theology. He questions why one would reinterpret the Resurrection based on scientific evidence but not have a problem accepting an ancient earth. He emphasizes that Scripture should be the final authority for Christians, not the opinions of Christian scientists or scholars.

The critic claims that none of us can read the Bible simply at face value due to cultural background and historical context. Bates agrees but argues that when it comes to Genesis 1, the plain meaning of the text is clear and has been understood as such throughout history. He rejects the idea that Genesis 1 could be a parable or story, pointing to the consistent interpretation of the word "day" throughout Scripture.

Bates highlights the importance of understanding Genesis as real history, as it forms the basis for many doctrines in Christianity. He references Jesus' lineage traced back to Adam, emphasizing that Jesus had to become a human descendant of Adam to be our Savior.

The critic suggests that Genesis 1 might be a parable or story, but Bates disagrees, stating that the genre of Genesis 1 is historical narrative. He argues that if Genesis is not real literal history, it undermines the Gospel and the need for a Savior. Bates also addresses the claim that an old earth is derived from an interpretation of geology, pointing out that an old-earth view places millions of years of death before Adam's sin, contradicting the biblical account.

Bates concludes by emphasizing that an old-earth view is not in conflict with science itself but rather with interpretations of scientific data. He encourages readers to have a high view of Scripture and to seek to understand its teachings without compromising with secular science.

Why This Matters: Understanding the age of the earth is a significant issue for Christians as it affects our understanding of the authority and reliability of Scripture. The debate between young-earth and old-earth creationists has implications for our understanding of God's character, the Gospel message, and the interpretation of other biblical passages. It is essential for Christians to carefully examine these issues and consider the implications for their faith.

Think About It: How does your view on the age of the earth impact your understanding of Scripture and your faith? Do you believe that the Bible should be taken at face value, or do you think it should be interpreted in light of scientific theories? Consider how your perspective on this issue aligns with your overall approach to interpreting Scripture.